Created by Ryan
Do you agree or disagree with Charles choice to get hypnotized? Explain your opinion by using examples from the story.
Created by Ryan
6 Comments
Danny G.
3/24/2012 09:39:13 pm
I disagree with Charles Wallace's decision to get hipnotized because the man with red eyes might be playing a trick on them. After Charles gets hipnotized, he eats the meal without saying it tastes like sand{page 147}.
Reply
Ryan
3/27/2012 09:58:14 am
It needs 1 more detail, and don't mention anything in later chapters.
Reply
Sam Baugh
3/25/2012 03:25:12 am
I disagree with the fact that Charles Wallace chose to get hypnotized by the man with red eyes, even though he wants to do it for a good cause, to find his father p.131 "I have to try. For Father Meg. Please. I want- I want to know my Father-." It was a bad choice because he put himself in peril. He fell under the control of the man with red eyes out of a little arrogance thinking he could escape from his hypnotized state.
Reply
Danny Gray
3/27/2012 05:30:31 am
I couldn't agree more! No errors. Good job.
Reply
Ryan
3/27/2012 09:59:43 am
You need more sentences and 2 more details.
Reply
Ryan
3/27/2012 09:56:16 am
I think that "going" to the man with red eyes was a terrible choice. First, he put himself in too much danger by getting hypnotized by the man with red eyes. Second, on page 130, Charles Wallace said " If I come in can get back out again? " and relies to much on his strengths and forgets that the man with red eyes might be powerful. Third, I apriciate that Charles Wallace is fighting for family, but it was terribly stupid of him to " go " to the man with red eyes and put himself in mortal danger. Really, who figuritivly puts their dreams, family, and life into a blender and KA-BAM, there all of it goes. In my mind, that was a terrible choice.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
April 2012
Categories |